Submitted app packages
Build artifacts are treated as sensitive customer materials. Access is limited to the protection workflow and personnel needed for setup, troubleshooting, or customer-approved review.
Security
RiskFront Lab handles mobile app packages, runtime policies, and threat telemetry. The security model is designed around limited access, explicit retention, reviewable policy changes, and event evidence that avoids unnecessary user content.
Safeguard ledger
Build artifacts are treated as sensitive customer materials. Access is limited to the protection workflow and personnel needed for setup, troubleshooting, or customer-approved review.
Runtime events focus on security context such as app version, policy action, platform, device-risk indicators, severity, and timestamp. Product content is not required for normal threat routing.
Enforcement actions such as blocking a session or limiting a feature should be reviewed before production rollout, especially for financial, health, identity, or paid access flows.
Connections to CI, storage, ticketing, messaging, or security tooling should use scoped credentials and only the permissions needed for the agreed workflow.
RiskFront Lab is designed to send severe or ambiguous events to human review instead of treating every signal as an automatic final decision.
Automated policy assistance can help configure defenses, but sensitive enforcement choices should remain visible, reversible, and tied to customer-approved rules.
Control records
Which staff, systems, and service components can see submitted packages, policy settings, and telemetry?
How long are app packages, protected builds, policy history, and runtime events retained for the customer account?
Which storage and transfer paths protect customer materials, and how are secrets for integrations handled?
Who approves enforcement policies before they can affect a production user session?
Which events are sent to AppSec, fraud, support, or engineering, and which events are only summarized?
What should happen if telemetry is delayed, an integration fails, or a policy action creates unexpected support volume?